Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.18 seconds)

Suo Motu Writ Petition On The Reports ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ... on 20 September, 2006

In another decision of Division Bench At Nagpur in Writ Petition 3073 of 2019, Ashish and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors., decided on 16-04-2019 (MANU/MH/1340/2019), after the petitioner had shown readiness to deposit the amount of penalty which was already imposed, it appears that the vehicles were directed to be released upon the deposit of the penalty, and at the same time it was observed that the payment shall not be considered as acceptance by the petitioner about the commission of offence. Therefore, a similar view is then required to be taken in the interest of justice, by molding the orders of the Division Bench of this Court above referred. Hence, following order.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2156 - R M Lodha - Full Document

M/S Saudagar Agencies Contractor ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 5 February, 2019

Under such circumstance, it is for this Court to take the same view that was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in case of Ambadas Manikrao Saudagar (Supra) that some amount can be directed to be deposited by the petitioner with the revenue authorities and then on that condition the tractor can be released. Taking into consideration the contents of the First Information Report, that the illegal excavation of sand was to the tune of Rs.1,82,000/-, it would be appropriate for this Court to direct the petitioner to deposit amount of Rs.1,00,000/- with the Revenue Authorities in addition to the other terms those have been imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, and by setting aside the term 5 (A) in the said order. This order would then be without prejudice to the rights of the Revenue authorities to proceed under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.
1