J.K. Cigarettes Ltd. vs Superintendent Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1988
(a) J& K Cigarettee Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise[2009(242) ELT 189(Del)[
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.42 seconds)) M/S. Slotco Steel Products Pvt. ... vs Cce, Delhi on 19 March, 2010
4.3 As held by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Vs. M/s. Kalvert Foods India Pvt.(supra) statements, recorded by Central Excise officer can be relied upon. As far as first appellant and its partner are concerned, statements have never been ever retracted.
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S Parmarth Iron Pvt. Ltd. on 29 November, 2010
(d) CCE Vs. Parmarth Iron Pvt. Ltd[2010(260)ELT 514 (All.)]
The Central Excise Act, 1944
M/S. Agrawal Round Rolling Mills Ltd vs C.C.E. & S.T. Raipur on 26 May, 2014
(a) Ahmednagar Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE, [2014(300)ELT119(Tri. Mumbai)]
S.M.Steel Ropes vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 13 February, 2014
(b) S.M. Steel Ropes Vs. CCE[2014(304) ELT 591(Tri. Mumbai)]
M/S.Cev Engineering Pvt. Ltd vs Cce, Delhi-Ii on 31 March, 2014
(c) Markas Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE [2014(310) ELT. 431(Bom.)]
M/S. Tata Motors Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 9 July, 2013
(f) Galaxy Indo Fab. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow[2010 (258) ELT 254(Tri.Del)]
It was also emphasized that appellant No. 3 has retracted the statement therefore retracted statement cannot be relied upon.
M/S Mahajan Steel Rolling Mills ... vs Cce Ludhiana on 22 January, 2014
Ld. A.R. Submitted that this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Mahajan Steel Rolling Mills Pvt Ltd. Vs. CCE, Ludhiana[2011-TIOL-1680-CESTAT-DEL] has confirmed the demand on the final product based upon unaccounted inputs.
1