Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.43 seconds)Section 65 in Finance Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Article 246 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Commissioner Of Cus. (Import) vs Larsen And Toubro Ltd. on 1 November, 1999
In this
regard, he placed reliance on Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in
Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus., Kerala Vs. Larsen & Toubro
(supra), wherein it was held that works contract is special species of
contract distinct from a contract of service simpliciter. It was held in this
case that the "gross amount charged" is applicable for services provided
and not the gross amount of the works contract as a whole:
The Finance Act, 2018
Croda India Company Pvt Ltd vs Commr.Service Tax- Vii Mumbai on 17 May, 2019
15. The learned Counsel for Appellant submits that the activity
undertaken by them is under the category of 'Works Contract service'
which is completely different from the head under which the service tax
demand is raised, hence making the entire demand liable to be
quashed. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant in this regard, placed
reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble CESTAT, Mumbai bench in the
case of M/s. Ajit India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax
reported in 2018 (19) GSTL 659 (Tri. Mumbai), wherein the
Hon'ble Tribunal concluded that the demand of tax does not sustain,
since it had not been raised under the correct head for the period after
01.06.2007.
Commissioner Of Service Tax, Etc.Etc. vs M/S.Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd. Etc.Etc. on 18 November, 2016
-LB) affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Commissioner of Service Tax v. Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd. 2018
(10) GSTL 118 (SC), wherein the core issue was similar in nature i.e.:
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 2 March, 2006
ii. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. Union of India, - 2006 (2)
S.T.R. 161 (S.C.).
Commissioner Of Service Tax Delhi vs Quick Heal Technologies Limited on 5 August, 2022
iii. Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi Vs. Quick Heal
Technologies Ltd., - 2022 (63) GSTL 385 (SC)
iv. Ocean Interior Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of GST and Central
Excise, Chennai - (2023) 10 Centax 208 (Tri-Mad)
affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of
Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Chennai Vs.
Ocean Interior Ltd. - (2023) 10 Centax 209 (SC)