Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.27 seconds)Section 13 in Indian Companies Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in Indian Companies Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in Indian Companies Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Mangayarkarasi Apparels Pvt. Ltd., ... vs Sundaram Finance Ltd., Pattullos Road, ... on 30 April, 2002
This view, however, has not been followed by Division Bench of Madras High Court and taking contrary view in the case of Mangayarkarasi Apparels Pvt. Ltd. v. Sundaram Finance Ltd. (supra), the Division Bench of Madras High Court differed with aforesaid view of Bombay High Court. The relevant discussion of the Madras High Court in the aforesaid judgment is in the following terms :
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 12 in Indian Companies Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
M/S. Anuptech Equipments Private Ltd. vs M/S. Ganpati Co-Op. Housing Society ... on 30 January, 1999
"As against the above pronouncement of the Apex Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of the Bombay High Court in Anuptech Equipments Pvt. Ltd. v. Ganpati Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. (supra). Rebello, J. while taking note of the dichotomy maintained between the statutory arbitration and arbitration under bilateral agreement, held that the arbitral tribunal is not a tribunal within the meaning of Article 226 of the Constitution, nevertheless held a writ could be issued under Article 226 of the Constitution where no other remedy is available on an aggrieved person.