Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.27 seconds)
Smt Paras Pathak vs Department Of Posts on 17 October, 2025 cites

Union Of India & Others vs Vinay Kumar Upadhyay & Another on 7 August, 2017

14. It is apt to mention that in the latest judgment/order dated 29.08.2025 passed by 3 judge‟s Bench of the Hon‟ble Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Diary No(s). 35662 of 2025 Union of India & Ors. v/s Vijay Kumar Upadhyay & Ors., has declined to interfere with the findings recorded by Hon‟ble High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur in WPS No. 1912/2021 dated 03.10.2024. Thus, the said judgment has attained finality and in our considered view the same holds the field on the subject for counting the period of training in the case of RTP employees for the purpose of grant of financial upgradation and other consequential benefits including the pensionary benefits to them.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - N Mhatre - Full Document

Union Of India vs Ex. Hav. Raksh Pal Singh And Anr on 12 October, 2015

4. He submits that though this Court in WP(C) no.6973/2024, titled Union of India & Ors. v. Raksh Pal Singh & Ors. vide its Judgment dated 27.05.2024, has dismissed a similar challenge on merits, and a Special Leave Petition there against has also been dismissed vide Order dated 10.12.2024 passed in SLP(C) No. 29726/2024, in another case, that is, in SLP(C) Diary No. 1868/2024, titled Union of India and Ors. v. Ravi Krishna and Ors, the Supreme Court while dismissing the petition, has left the question of law open.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - R K Agrawal - Full Document

Rushibhai Jagdishchandra Pathak vs Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation on 18 May, 2022

::27 :: OA No. 105/2025 & allied matters The Hon‟ble Apex Court in the case of Rushibhai Jagdishbhai Pathak Vs Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation [(2022) 18 Supreme Court Cases 144] while considering the grievance of the appellants therein about withdrawal of higher pay scale granted to them and subsequent revision of their pay scale as well as recovery towards excess payments which was raised by them before the concerned High Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 67 - A Rastogi - Full Document

All India Postal Employees Union vs Union Of India . on 7 May, 2015

4.4 Since, the employees working under the RTP scheme have not been granted the benefit of financial upgradation and regularization, being aggrieved the All India Postal Employee‟s Union had filed an OA, ::17 :: OA No. 105/2025 & allied matters which was decided by the Jabalpur Bench of this Tribunal vide judgment dated 16th December, 1986 (i.e., TA No. 82/1986, All India Postal Employees Union Vs Union of India through Secretary, Postal Department & Ors.), in the said order the Jabalpur Bench while deprecating the stoppage of further recruitment and absorption for the cadre of post of Postal Assistants, had issued various directions to review such policy as also directed the respondents to absorb the RTP employee against regular post in phase manner in terms of circular dated 30.10.1980 as if no restriction has been imposed on their regular recruitment/absorption earlier, if necessary by creating supernumerary posts, and subject to screening of the unfit by specially constituted Screening Committee to examine their record and performance as also by keeping in view the seniority of the said RTP employees.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - H L Dattu - Full Document

Union Of India And Ors. vs N.K. (P) Ltd. And Ors. on 30 October, 1970

8.11 Learned counsel for the respondents also relied upon the judgment passed by High Court of Patna in the case of Bipin Bihari Dutta V/s Union of India decided on 28.02.2012 wherein by relying upon the decision rendered by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of K.N.Sivadas(supra) High Court rejected the claim for reckoning their RTP period as qualifying service.
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 6 - H R Khanna - Full Document

Union Of India & Anr vs Tarsem Singh on 13 August, 2008

After nearly seven years challenging the impugned orders, by referring and relying upon the judgment passed in Tarsem Singh (supra) as well other judgment on the point of law of limitation and doctrine of delay and laches, limit on applicability of such rule as well as aspect of "continuity" and "recurring" cause of action and "continuity wrongs" the Hon‟ble Apex Court held that Principles underlying "continuing wrongs" and "recurring/successive wrongs" have been applied to service law disputes. A "continuing wrongs" refers to a single wrongful act which causes a continuing injury.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 2254 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 3 Next