Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)
M.Samudi vs – cites

Sree Sree Ishwar Sridhar Jew vs Sushila Bala Dasi And Others on 16 November, 1953

Again in Sree Sree Wshwar Sridhar Jew vs. Kst.Sushila Bala Dasi and others it has been held by the Supreme Court that no shebait can, so long as he continues to be the sevait, ever claim adverse possession against the idol and that no dealing of his with the property dedicated to the idol could afford the basis of a claim by him for adverse possession of the property against the idol. Therefore, in view of these decisions and in view of the admitted status of the 3rd defendant in connection with the temple, I am of the view that neither he nor his successors-in-title the 1st and 2nd defendants herein, can prescribe against the deity by adverse possession and thereby get title.” 31 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ W.P. Nos.25908/2024, etc. Batch
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 9 - N H Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 Next