Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.77 seconds)
Anil Agarwal vs Institute Of Chartered Accountants on 21 January, 2000 cites

Mohan Lal Tripathi vs District Magistrate, Rae Bareilly And ... on 15 May, 1992

In the impugned judgment the High Court has placed reliance on the decision of this court in Mohan Lal Tripathi v. District Magistrate, Rai Bareilly wherein this court was dealing with the provisions contained in sub-section (2) of section 87-A of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 which empowered the members of a Municipal Board to remove the President who was directly elected by the electorate by moving a motion of no confidence. The validity of the said provision was challenged before this court on the ground that it was violative of the democratic concept since it provided for removal or recall of an elected representative by a smaller and different body than the one that elected him. The said contention was, however, rejected by this court. It was observed: (SCC PP 84-85, 88 and 89, paras 2, 4 and 5).
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 79 - R M Sahai - Full Document

Shrimati Hira Devi And Others vs District Board, Shahjahanpur on 20 October, 1952

"12, In Hira Devi v. District Board, Shahranpur, the Supreme Court has warned that lacuna could not be supplied by any liberal construction by the High Courts. In the words of N.H. Bhagwati, J., 'No doubt it is the duty of the court to try and harmonise the various provisions of an Act passed by the Legislature. But it is certainly not the duty of the court to stretch the words used by the Legislature to fill in gaps or omissions in the provisions of an Act.'"
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 75 - N H Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 3 Next