Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.34 seconds)
Sri Ram Krishna Das vs Bindeshwari Prasad And Ors. on 11 January, 1950 cites

S.R.M.A.R. Ramanathan Chettiar vs Rajah Sir Annamalai Chettiar And Ors. on 19 January, 1934

7. Taking the finding of the Subordinate Judge as it stands it seems to me that the Subordinate Judge has clearly gone wrong by refusing to exercise his jurisdiction in respect of the Patna property. The proper procedure might ordinarily be, as suggested in the cases of Ramanathan Chettiar v. Annamalai Chettiar, (57 Mad. 1031 : A.I.R. (21) 1934 Mad.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Sardar Nisar Ali Khan vs K.B. Sardar Mohammad Ali Khan on 21 April, 1932

A case in point is Nisar Ali v. Mohammad Ali, 59 I.A. 268 : (A.I.R. (19) 1932 P.C. 172) where the inclusion in the suit of property in the Punjab which the plaintiff claimed as mutwalli of Muhammadan wakf, was not held to affect the maintainability of his suit in the Oudh Court in respect of an estate comprising properties in Oudh and the Punjab, claimed by him under a testamentary disposition made by his father.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Kubra Jan vs Ram Bali And Anr. on 8 August, 1908

237: (4 A.L.J. 121), where the plaintiff sued as heir of his father to recover various portions of his father's estate from the hands of different alienees and in Kubra Jan v. Bam Bali, 30 ALL. 560 : (5 A.L.J. 647), where the plaintiff as heiress of her father sued to recover from her brother and certain transferees from him her share of the property of her deceased father. The latter decision is of special interest as the suit related to property partly in Bareily district and partly in the district of Bara Banki in the Province of Oudh. During the course of the suit, a compromise was arrived at regarding the Bareily property. Nevertheless, their Lordships held that the Court at Bareily was not divested of its jurisdiction to hear and decide the suit in respect of the property situate in Oudh.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1