Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.27 seconds)Section 21 in The Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Shri Kashinath Laxman Waghmare, Shri ... vs Shri Ganpat Tukaram Kashmire (Deceased ... on 21 January, 2003
In the case of Kashinath
Laxman Waghmare (supra), the learned Single Judge of this Court
(Coram : S. A. Bobde, J., as His Lordship then was) referred to the
decision of B. B. Deshpande (supra) and held that a tenant cannot
assign tenancy rights in agricultural land by an instrument styled as a
Will. Such an assignment would be in contravention of Section 27 of the
Act.
Yallappa Basappa Googyala 'D' By Lrs. vs Land Tribunal, Bagalkot And Ors. on 16 September, 1998
a. B. B. Deshpande Vs. D. N. Deshpande, 1993 B. C. J. 626;
b. Kashinath Laxman Waghmare Vs. Ganpat Tukaram Kashmire,
2003 (2) ALL MR 233; and
c. Sangappa Kalyanappa Bangi (decd) through LRs Vs. Land
Tribunal, Jamkhandi, AIR 1998 SC 3229.
Appa Narsappa Magdum (D)Thr. Lrs vs Akubai Ganapati Nimbalkar And Ors on 4 May, 1999
In
support of this Petition, he relied upon Appa Narsappa Madgum (decd)
through LRs Vs. Akubai Ganapathi Nimbalkar, AIR 1999 SC 1963.
Sudam Ganpat Kutwal P.A. Holder Of ... vs Shevantabai Tukaram Gulumkar (Dead) By ... on 18 August, 2006
In support of this
submission, he relied upon the decision in Sudam Ganpat Kutwal Vs.
Shevantabai Tukaram Gulumkar, (2006) 7 SCC 200. Assuming that
the partition is validly made and the suit land was allotted to the share of
minor son Uddhav, he did not issue intimation as contemplated by
proviso to Section 32-F(1)(a) after attaining the majority. He, therefore,
submitted that the Petition requires consideration.