Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.36 seconds)
L.S.Shivakumar vs L.B.Sannaiah & Ors on 4 September, 2015 cites

Workmen Of Dimakuchi Tea Estate vs The Management Of Dimakuchitea Estate on 4 February, 1958

In this regard, we may usefully refer to an authority in Workmen v. Dimakuchi Tea Estate[3], wherein the three-Judge Bench while interpreting the expression “any person” occurring in Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 observed that the definition clause must be read in the context of the subject matter and scheme of the Act, and consistently with the objects and other provisions of the Act. Elaborating further, the Court proceeded to state:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 163 - Full Document

Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Qimat Rai Gupta & Ors on 27 July, 2007

In this context, reference to the authority in MCD v. Qimat Rai Gupta and others[4] is of significance. In the said case, the Court was interpreting the word “made” occurring in Section 126(4) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, which stipulated that no amendment under sub-section 1 shall be made in the assessment list in relation to certain aspects. It was contended before this Court on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi that the use of the expression “made” occurring in the said sub-section would necessitate communication of the order. It was contended before this Court by the Corporation that the distinction must be made between communication of order and making thereof inasmuch as whereas communication may be necessary so as to enable an assessee to prefer an appeal against the order of assessment but only signing of the order would subserve the purpose of saving the period of limitation. The submission was that the expression “no amendment under sub-section (1) shall be made” should be given a liberal interpretation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 60 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Surendra Singh And Others vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 16 November, 1953

25. After so stating, the Court proceeded to interpret the term “made” and observed that meaning of a word depends upon the text and context and it will also depend upon the purport and object it seeks to achieve. The two-Judge Bench referred to Surendra Singh v. State of U.P.[6], Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Dy. Land Acquisition Officer[7] and K.Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhya Balan[8].
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 130 - V Bose - Full Document

Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh vs The Deputy Land Acquisition Officer And ... on 30 March, 1961

25. After so stating, the Court proceeded to interpret the term “made” and observed that meaning of a word depends upon the text and context and it will also depend upon the purport and object it seeks to achieve. The two-Judge Bench referred to Surendra Singh v. State of U.P.[6], Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Dy. Land Acquisition Officer[7] and K.Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhya Balan[8].
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 617 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

K. Bhaskaran vs Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan And Anr on 29 September, 1999

25. After so stating, the Court proceeded to interpret the term “made” and observed that meaning of a word depends upon the text and context and it will also depend upon the purport and object it seeks to achieve. The two-Judge Bench referred to Surendra Singh v. State of U.P.[6], Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Dy. Land Acquisition Officer[7] and K.Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhya Balan[8].
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 3240 - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Khemi Ram on 6 October, 1969

26. We have referred to the aforesaid authority in extenso as the Division Bench has in one line stated that the said decision makes it clear that communication of an order is necessary ingredient for bringing an end result to a status or to provide a person an opportunity to take recourse to law if he is aggrieved thereby, then the said order is required to be communicated.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 165 - J M Shelat - Full Document
1   2 Next