Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
V.G.K.Naidu vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd on 20 August, 2015
14. As observed in the said decision, even assuming that the Scheme is Ex Gratia,
it cannot be countenanced that its implementation can be arbitrary. The
administration of the Scheme, particularly by a public sector undertaking, must
satisfy all norms of fairness as guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution of
India when it confers benefits to similarly placed employees, it is not the case of
the BPCL that the Applicant for any other reason is disqualified except on the
issue of such undertaking not being filed.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M/S. Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd vs Union Of India And Anr on 28 April, 2004
Mr. Cama nonetheless has a new argument when he
submits that the said decision of the Kerala High Court needs to be applied in the
present case by referring to the decision of the Supreme Court in proceedings in
Kusum Ingots & Alloys Limited Vs. Union of India and Another 3, when the
Supreme Court in paragraph 22 observed thus:
Milind Vidyasagar Ghate vs Bharat Prtroleum Corporation Ltd. And 3 ... on 8 March, 2021
2. At the outset, Ms. Gayatri Singh would submit that the prayers as made in
this application stand squarely covered by the order dated 19 November 2025,
passed by this Court in the case of Milind V. Ghate Vs. Bharat Petroleum
Page 1 of 13
20 April 2026
Kiran Kawre
::: Uploaded on - 24/04/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 25/04/2026 05:19:51 :::
23-IA-1404-2019F.DOC
Corporation Ltd and Others1.
Mohan Bagoji Gurkhe vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd And 5 ... on 23 March, 2021
We are
hence not resting solely on the order dated 19th October 2018 passed by the
Division Bench of this Court in the case of Mohan Gurkhe (supra) as such order
was passed on concession of the BPCL.
1