Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)
Manoj Chauhan vs Suman Sehgal on 12 July, 2019 cites

M.P. State Legal Service Authority vs Prateek Jain And Anr on 10 September, 2014

14. Therefore, given the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H., (2010) 5 SCC 663 and further explained in Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority vs. Prateek Jain and another (2014) 10 SCC 690, sufficient reasons exist to waive off the compounding fee. Hence, this Court, need not resort to the powers conferred under section 482 CrPC and all Courts can grant such relief by placing reliance upon the jurisprudence behind the Judicial precedents, cited before. Therefore, this Court is dispensing with the compounding ::: Downloaded on - 29/09/2019 00:45:10 :::HCHP 11 fee, quantified at 15% of the sum, and the same is waived off. The criminal revision stands closed, and in a nutshell, the Court is .
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 359 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H on 3 May, 2010

14. Therefore, given the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H., (2010) 5 SCC 663 and further explained in Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority vs. Prateek Jain and another (2014) 10 SCC 690, sufficient reasons exist to waive off the compounding fee. Hence, this Court, need not resort to the powers conferred under section 482 CrPC and all Courts can grant such relief by placing reliance upon the jurisprudence behind the Judicial precedents, cited before. Therefore, this Court is dispensing with the compounding ::: Downloaded on - 29/09/2019 00:45:10 :::HCHP 11 fee, quantified at 15% of the sum, and the same is waived off. The criminal revision stands closed, and in a nutshell, the Court is .
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 5512 - Full Document

Mrs. Jamuna Uke vs State Of Chhattisgarh 121 ... on 3 November, 2017

The matter for consideration before this Court is the criminal revision petition, filed under sections 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, starting now to be called as CrPC. The petitioner is challenging the judgment dated 5.1.2019, passed by Sessions Judge, Solan, dismissing his appeal, (Criminal appeal no. 2-S/10 of 2018) and upholding the decision of the trial Court, dated 19-12-2017, passed by Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Court No. 2, Solan, H.P., (Case no. 298-3/2015, Suman Sehgal Vs. ::: Downloaded on - 29/09/2019 00:45:10 :::HCHP 2 Manoj Chauhan), convicting the accused of commission of an offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable instruments .
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 2807 - P K Mishra - Full Document
1   2 Next