Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.38 seconds)

Sudesh Chhikara vs Ramti Devi on 6 December, 2022

In such a situation, the two conditions mentioned in Sudesh (supra) must be appropriately interpreted to further the beneficial nature of the legislation and not strictly which would render otiose the intent of the legislature. Therefore, the Single Judge of the High Court and the tribunals below had rightly held the Gift Deed to be cancelled since the conditions for the well-being of the senior citizens were not complied with. We are unable to agree with the view taken by the Division Bench, because it takes a strict view of a beneficial legislation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 29 - A Oka - Full Document

Urmila Dixit vs Sunil Sharan Dixit on 23 January, 2023

47. The legal position, as narrated in the aforementioned paragraphs, in the context of the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and High Courts, makes it clear that the conditions under Section 23(1) of the Senior Citizens Act need not be explicit, but might be implied. The love and affection being the consideration, which can be traced out in the Settlement 7/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/07/2025 04:02:47 pm ) W.P(MD)No.8160 of 2025 Deed, would be sufficient to hold that such love and affection is an implied condition that the senior citizen will be taken care of by the beneficiary of the Settlement Deed or gift deed. In the event of neglecting the senior citizen, the deed of settlement or gift is liable to be annulled.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1