Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)Union Of India And Ors vs Union Of India & Anr. Air 1989 1215 ... on 19 August, 2010
In light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the case of C.R. Madhava Murthy (supra) and decision of the
12
coordinate benches of this Tribunal in OA No. 3079/2012 &
OA No. 2124/2011, this OA is allowed. Accordingly, the
impugned order dated 19.02.2016 is quashed and set aside.
We further direct the respondents to re-fix the pay of the
applicant at par with his junior from 09.08.1999 after
examining the pay of the aforesaid junior as mentioned in para
2 of this order, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of
receipt of a certified copy of this order. No costs.
S. Harcharan Sinoh vs Union Of India on 28 August, 1990
"7. We do not agree with the submissions
advanced by Mr. Arora. In condition 8 for grant of
benefit under the ACP scheme in the aforesaid
memorandum, on which Mr. Arora has relied, it is
mentioned that the financial upgradation under
this scheme shall be purely personal to the
employee and shall have no relevance to his
seniority position, therefore, there shall be no
additional financial upgradation for the senior
employee on the ground that the junior employee
in the grade has got higher pay scale under the
ACP scheme. The learned Tribunal while dealing
with this aspect on the facts of the present case,
has relied upon the view already taken in
11
Harcharan Singh Sudans case (supra), para 14
thereof reads thus:
Madan Gopal Sharma vs Union Of India on 20 September, 2018
10. Finding that the facts of this case are covered by the
decision in the case of Harcharan Singh Sudans case as
well as Madan Gopal Sharma and Others (supra), this
Original Application is allowed to the extent that
annexure A-2 relating to rejection of claim of applicant is
quashed and set aside.
1