Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (3.06 seconds)

Srihari Hanumandas Totala vs Hemant Vithal Kamat on 9 August, 2021

I. In a case between Srihari Hanumandas Totala Vs. Hemant Vithal Kamat & Others reported in (2021) 9 SCC 99 that, plaint in subsequent suit cannot rejected on ground that it is barred by principles of res judicata as same will require production of pleadings, issues framed and judgment in previous suit, to compare it with present suit and that cannot be done for deciding an application under Order 7, Rule 11(d), as only the averments in the paint itself may be considered at this stage. The same can only be determined upon trial of the suit as CRP No.7 of 2022 Page 6 of 9 only the averments in the plaint itself may be considered at this stage.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 138 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Tek Chand & Anr. vs . Kimtu Devi. & Ors. Alongwith on 3 October, 2023

II. In a case between Tek Chand & Another Vs. Kimtu Devi & Others reported in 2024 (3) Civ.C.C. 667 (HP) (DB) that, plaint cannot be rejected on a plea of Res Judicata raised by defendants, because, adjudication of plea of Res Judicata requires consideration of pleadings, issues and the decision in the previous suit, which cannot be done in an application under Order 7, Rule 11 of the CPC, 1908.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1