Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (1.25 seconds)The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
State Bank Of India vs Ghamandi Ram (Dead) Through Shri Gurbax ... on 13 February, 1969
In State Bank of India Vs. Ghamandi Ram [supra (ii)] it was held:-
Ganpat Ram Sharma & Ors vs Smt. Gayatri Devi on 17 July, 1987
In Ganpat Ram Sharma and Ors. Vs. Smt. Gyatri Devi [supra (v)] is on the
point of delay in filing the eviction petition. In that case it was held:-
C. Krishna Prasad vs C.I.T., Bangalore on 12 November, 1974
In Krishna Prasad VS. CIT Bangalore [supra (iii)] as well as AIR 1969
Hon'ble Supreme Court 682 paged 634 it was held :-
M.L. Subbaraya Setty (Dead) By Lrs. And ... vs M.L. Nagappa Setty (Dead) By Lrs. And ... on 23 April, 2002
In the case of M.L. Subbaraya Setty Vs. M.L. Nagappa Setty [supra (iv)] it
was held:-
B.R. Mehta vs Smt. Atma Devi & Ors on 2 September, 1987
In the case of B.R. Mehta Vs. Smt. Atma Devi [supra (i)] it was held as
under:-
The Societies Registration Act, 1860
The Limitation Act, 1963
Avinash Kaur vs Beli Ram on 23 September, 1970
30. As regard the date of acquisition of the property it may also be observed,
that the tenant has not disclosed when the property was purchased and when it was
constructed. He has also not disclosed when it was firstly let/re-let but his answer to
interrogatories shows that it was certainly available for occupation in the year 1972.
13
As such, even the judgment delivered in the case of Dr. Avinash Kaur Vs. Dr. Beli Rat
is of no help to the petitioner.