Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (2.43 seconds)

Sudesh Chhikara vs Ramti Devi on 6 December, 2022

In such a situation, the two conditions mentioned in Sudesh (supra) must be appropriately interpreted to further the beneficial nature of the legislation and not strictly which would render otiose the intent of the legislature. Therefore, the Single Judge of the High Court and the tribunals below had rightly held the Gift Deed to be cancelled since the conditions for the well-being of 7/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/06/2025 06:55:00 pm ) W.P.(MD) No.16897 of 2025 the senior citizens were not complied with. We are unable to agree with the view taken by the Division Bench, because it takes a strict view of a beneficial legislation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 29 - A Oka - Full Document

Urmila Dixit vs Sunil Sharan Dixit on 23 January, 2023

6. The rights of the petitioner under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009 and the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, has been now clarified by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Urmila Dixit Vs Sunil Sharan Dixit 5/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/06/2025 06:55:00 pm ) W.P.(MD) No.16897 of 2025 and others reported in 2025 SCC Online SC 2, wherein it has been held as under:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1