Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (1.62 seconds)Section 59 in The Patents Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Article 53 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 27 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Designs Act, 1911
The Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002
Article 84 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 5 in The Patents Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Patents Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
The Chinese University Of Hong Kong vs The Assistant Controller Of Patents And ... on 11 July, 2023
39. The ld. Amicus Curiae submits that though the Madras High Court in
Chinese University case (supra) did not agree with the view that casus
omissus ought to be supplied for interpreting Section 3(i) of the Act, the
conclusion of the Madras High Court is that both in vivo and in vitro diagnosis
are excluded by Section 3(i) of the Act. However, the Madras High Court has
held, after discussing the opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the
European Patent Office in Case Number G 0001/04, that if diagnosis for
treatment is made, even if the diagnosis is not definitive, then the invention
would not be eligible for grant of patent.