Ram Prakash Arora vs State Of Punjab on 22 March, 1972
In Ram Prakash Arora v. State of Punjab this Court, speaking about the evidence of trap witnesses, observed :
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (2.04 seconds)Darshan Lal vs The Delhi Administration on 20 November, 1973
14. Again, the Apex Court in Darshan Lal v. Delhi Administration ) while dealing with the evidence of the trap witnesses, held as under :
Som Parkash vs State Of Punjab on 29 November, 1991
15. Similarly, in Som Parkash v. State of Punjab , the Supreme Court, while considering the evidence of the trap witnesses in a bribe case, held as under :
Basdeo Agarwalla vs Emperor on 19 January, 1945
In Basdeo Agarwalla v. Emperor AIR 1945 FC 16 : 1945 (46) Cri LJ 510, and again in Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan v. State of Gujarat , the Apex Court, while considering the question of validity of sanction, held as under :
Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan vs State Of Gujarat on 3 September, 1997
In Basdeo Agarwalla v. Emperor AIR 1945 FC 16 : 1945 (46) Cri LJ 510, and again in Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan v. State of Gujarat , the Apex Court, while considering the question of validity of sanction, held as under :
Mohd. Iqbal, Ahmad vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 18 January, 1979
Any case instituted without a proper and valid sanction must fail because this being a manifest defect in the prosecution, the entire proceedings are rendered void ab initio, as is observed by the Apex Court in Mohd. Iqbal Ahmed v. State of Andhra Pradesh . The trial Court has landed in gross error in holding that the sanction for prosecution accorded by the sanctioning authority was valid and in accordance with law.
1