Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)Section 19 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Chief Information Commr.& Anr vs State Of Manipur & Anr on 12 December, 2011
10. Based on the facts stated by the CPIO in their reply that Dr. Bhimrao
Ambedkar Law University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, is a State Public University and
falls under the purview of the State, which is not covered under the jurisdiction
of Central Information Commission and upon perusal of records, the
Page 5 of 7
Commission noted that this is a Complaint filed under Section 18(2) the RTI
Act, 2005 where no further direction for disclosure of information can be given
in the light of the judgment decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case
of Chief Information Commissioner and another Vs. State of Manipur & Another
reported in MANU/SC/1484/2011: AIR 2012 SC 864 wherein it was held as
under:-
Rajesh Tiwari vs State Of Chhattisgarh 13 Wps/6051/2017 ... on 23 March, 2018
11. There is no mala fide denial of information or otherwise is found on the
part of CPIO in the instant case which calls for any action under Section 20 of
the RTI Act, 2005. In this regard, Commission relied on a judgment of the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the decision of Col. Rajendra Singh v. Central
Page 6 of 7
Information Commission and Anr. WP (C) 5469 of 2008 dated 20.03.2009
wherein it was held as under:
1