Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.36 seconds)

A.N.Kumar vs Arulmighu Arunachaleswarar ... on 3 March, 2011

In that perspective, this Court, after appreciating the peculiar situation that the petitioner/Orphanage would be left without any remedy since, in terms of the ratio laid down in A.N.Kumar's case (cited supra), there is a bar of jurisdiction of Civil Court under the 2nd proviso to Section-79 in respect of suits instituted by a lessee/licensee/mortgagee of the religious institution or endowment, and also applying the traditional definition of justice underlined in the maxim Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium  that there is no wrong without a remedy, is inclined to exercise its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution both for maintaining the writ petition and for granting the relief sought for so that the interest and welfare of the poor orphans are safeguarded. Hence, this Court is inclined to accede to the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition; accordingly, the impugned order is hereby set aside.
Madras High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 21 - R Banumathi - Full Document
1   2 Next