cites: 1371111

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)

Rex vs B.S. Nayyar on 31 January, 1950 cites

Andre Paul Terence Ambard vs The Attorney General Of Trinidad And ... on 2 March, 1936

In Andre Paul Terms Ambard v. Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, A.I.R. (23) 1906 P. c. 141 : (162 I. C. 92), their Lordships of the Judicial Committee say, at page 145 :

Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 134 - Full Document

Legal Remembrancer vs Matilal Ghose And Ors. on 30 June, 1913

and Legal Remembrancer v. Matilal Ghose, 41 Cal. 173 : (A.I.R. (1) 1914 Cal. 69 : 14 Cr. L. J. 321 S. B.). Thus, if the words used may reasonably be interpreted in two different ways and one of the interpretation, indicates contempt while the other does not, it cannot be said that contempt has been proved to have been committed.

Calcutta High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 20 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Andre Paul Terence Ambard vs The Attorney General Of Trinidad And ... on 2 March, 1936

Legal Remembrancer vs Matilal Ghose And Ors. on 30 June, 1913