Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.63 seconds)
The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Sunil Sah & Ors on 17 August, 2017 cites

Jitendra Kumar Singh & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 8 January, 2010

The appellants have failed to point out any infirmity in the findings even though they have attempted to argue the application of law in their favour on the basis of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Kumar Singh's case (Supra) and Vikas Sankhala's case (Supra). In ultimate analysis and upon consideration of the materials available on the records, we do not find any illegality or infirmity with the judgment under appeal and the directions issued by the learned Single Judge, remanding the same to the State authorities; they are obliged to comply with the directions of the learned Single Judge. The appeals preferred by the State of Bihar as well as the Central Selection Board for Constables have no merit and those are dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 368 - S S Nijjar - Full Document

The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Pinku Kumar Singh & Ors on 19 April, 2011

In the aforementioned background of facts, the list of successful candidates for appointment of constables was redrawn for Physical Evaluation Test-2 and appointments were made by the respondents in purported compliance of the orders and directions of Patna High Court LPA No.500 of 2016 dt. 17-08-2017 93/141 this Court contained in Pinku Kumar Singh's case [2011 (2) PLJR 405] and as affirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the judgment reported in The State of Bihar & Ors. V. Pinku Kumar Singh & Ors., reported in 2011 (3) PLJR 584. As a result of redrawing of the list, a large number of candidates who were selected in the first round of Physical Evaluation Test and whose names were incorporated in the list of successful candidates after the result of first round was published, were ousted. The candidates who were ousted felt aggrieved and they moved this Court giving rise to a batch of writ applications raising common questions and issues.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 54 - S K Singh - Full Document

The Chairman Central Selection Board Of ... vs Kamlesh Dikshit Raj & Ors on 24 July, 2017

In the case of Vikas Sankhala & Ors. (Supra), the Patna High Court LPA No.500 of 2016 dt. 17-08-2017 123/141 Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering an issue, inter alia, as to whether a relaxation in cut off marks for qualifying in the Teachers Eligibility Test (hereinafter referred to as 'TET') to the reserved category candidates may be permitted and if so whether reserved category candidates who secured better than general category candidates in the recruitment examination can be denied migration to general seats on the basis that they had availed relaxation in TET?
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 54 - A K Tripathi - Full Document

Deepa E.V vs Union Of India And Ors on 6 April, 2017

31. The principles of law laid down in the case of Jitender Kumar Singh (Supra) are in the context of interpretation of U.P. Patna High Court LPA No.500 of 2016 dt. 17-08-2017 121/141 Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) Act, 1994 and the facts situation of the said case as appearing in paragraphs 65 and 72 have been taken note of in the recent judgment of Deepa E.V. (Supra) which we would like to quote as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 125 - R Banumathi - Full Document
1   2 Next