Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)

P. C. Purushothama Reddiar vs S. Perumal on 2 December, 1971

In the P.C. Purushothama Reddiar vs. S. Perumal, reported in AIR 1972 SC 608 the court was concerned with some police reports, the correctness of which is presumed under s. 35 of the Evidence Act. Therefore if such report was admitted, the contents of the document were proved on such presumption. But in other circumstances, proving a document is completely different from proof of its contents. If a particular document says that according to the author of the document, the valuation of property B is Rs. X, when the document is admitted the fact that the author made that statement is proved. But whether the property is valued at Rs. X is not proved, unless it is shown that the author of the document is such an infallible expert that the statement proves the fact. In this case admittedly the valuer was not called or to be treated as an expert. Therefore the report per se is not to be taken as authoritative. Therefore, the materials on which the conclusions in the document were arrived at, lease deeds, rents paid in comparable properties had to be established by establishing the documents forming the basis of the report and proving other facts by cogent evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 188 - A N Grover - Full Document

R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder vs Arulmigu Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple & ... on 8 October, 2003

It is sought to be contended on behalf of the Respondent relying on P.C. Purushothama Reddiar vs. S. Perumal, reported in AIR 1972 SC 608, On the death of Aamal Dasgupta, Ashok Dasgupta and others, reported in AIR 1992 Cal 341, Allahabad Bank vs. Sourendra Nath Shaw and another, reported in AIR1997 Cal 80 and R.V.E.Venkatachala Gounder vs. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple and another, reported in (2003)8 SCC 752 that since the report was admitted in evidence its contents also stood proved. The other decisions of our high court have followed that decision. But all principles of law have to be applied correctly to the facts. Now, the first decision of the Supreme Court has become a very fertile source for misinterpreting and 8 misunderstanding the law by misinterpreting that decision. According to the above decisions as interpreted by the respondent if a document has been admitted in evidence its contents are also admitted in evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 830 - Full Document
1