Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.31 seconds)
Rekha Sangwan vs Department Of Personnel And Training on 13 April, 2026 cites

Rajesh Kumar Yadav vs High Court Of M.P. on 24 May, 2018

2. Ramesh Kumar Yadav v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Writ-A No. 12020 of 2022), "1. Petitioner is a Judicial Officer. He was initially appointed as Munsif/Civil Judge (Junior Division) on 24.03.2001. He was promoted as Civil Judge (Senior Division) on 16.10.2006. He was granted further promotion to the Higher Judicial Service under rule 22(1) of the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 on 02.07.2015. His date of birth is 05.02.1966 and would have attained the age of superannuation in the month of February, 2026. His tenure, however, has been curtailed on account of order impugned passed by the State Government on 29.11.2021 compulsorily retiring him from service by resorting to powers under the Financial Hand Book (Vol. II, Part II to IV) read with amended fundamental rule 56(C). At the time of passing of such order the petitioner was posted as Special Judge (Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Prevention of Atrocities Act) at ANJALI ANJALI 2026.04.13 16:41:43 +05'30' 25 Court No. II O.A. No. 1507/2023 Kaushambi. The order of compulsory retirement dated 29.11.2021 is thus assailed in the present writ petition.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next