Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.32 seconds)
Abhesinh Madubai Roz vs State Of Gujarat on 24 October, 2019 cites

P.V. Mahadevan vs M.D. Tamil Nadu Housing Board on 8 August, 2005

6. Furthermore, it was after a period of nine years from the date of alleged events of irregularities, the chargesheet was issued. Delay itself becomes prejudicial to the rights of the petitioner. The Supreme Court in P.V. Mahadevan v. M.D. T.N. Housing Board [(2005) 6 SCC 636], in M.V. Vijlani v. Union of India [(2006) 5 SCC 88] and in Anant R. Kulkarni v. Y.P. Education Society [(2013) 6 SCC 515], in which cases the inquiry was initiated belatedly after seven to ten years, it was observed that allowing the respondents to proceed further with the inquiry after such a long time would be very prejudicial to the delinquent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 781 - Full Document

M.V. Bijlani vs Union Of India & Ors on 5 April, 2006

6. Furthermore, it was after a period of nine years from the date of alleged events of irregularities, the chargesheet was issued. Delay itself becomes prejudicial to the rights of the petitioner. The Supreme Court in P.V. Mahadevan v. M.D. T.N. Housing Board [(2005) 6 SCC 636], in M.V. Vijlani v. Union of India [(2006) 5 SCC 88] and in Anant R. Kulkarni v. Y.P. Education Society [(2013) 6 SCC 515], in which cases the inquiry was initiated belatedly after seven to ten years, it was observed that allowing the respondents to proceed further with the inquiry after such a long time would be very prejudicial to the delinquent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 837 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Anant R Kulkarni vs Y.P.Education Society & Ors on 26 April, 2013

6. Furthermore, it was after a period of nine years from the date of alleged events of irregularities, the chargesheet was issued. Delay itself becomes prejudicial to the rights of the petitioner. The Supreme Court in P.V. Mahadevan v. M.D. T.N. Housing Board [(2005) 6 SCC 636], in M.V. Vijlani v. Union of India [(2006) 5 SCC 88] and in Anant R. Kulkarni v. Y.P. Education Society [(2013) 6 SCC 515], in which cases the inquiry was initiated belatedly after seven to ten years, it was observed that allowing the respondents to proceed further with the inquiry after such a long time would be very prejudicial to the delinquent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 262 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

K.B. Desai vs State And Anr. on 7 September, 1983

5.3 In K.B. Desai v. State [1984 (1) GLR 556] this Court considered Rule 189A of the Bombay Civil Service Rules which was pari materia to the aforesaid Page 4 of 6 Downloaded on : Sat Oct 26 01:09:56 IST 2019 C/SCA/14510/2018 CAV JUDGMENT Rule 24(2)(b)(ii) of the Pension Rules, 2002. The Court observed, "A departmental enquiry can be said to have been initiated when the show-cause notice is served upon the delinquent officer. By provisions of explanation clause (a) it leaves no doubt that the proceedings can be said to have been instituted when the statement of charge is issued to the delinquent officer or pensioner as the case may be. In the instant case there is no doubt that the charge sheet was issued after four years." (Para 8)
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1