Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.34 seconds)Punjab National Bank And Ors.The Chief ... vs Sh. Kunj Behari Misra, Sh. Shanti Prasad ... on 19 August, 1998
"30. Recently, a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Punjab National Bank V. Kunj Behari Mishra (1998) 7 SCC 84 : AIR 1998 SC 2713: (1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009), relying upon the earlier decisions of this Court in State of Assam V. Bimal Kumar Pandit (1964) 2 SCR 1 : AIR 1963 SC 1612; Institute of Chartered Accountants of India V. L. K. Ratna (1986) 4 SCC 537 : (AIR 1987 SC 71) as also the Constitution Bench decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad V. B. Karunakar (1993) 4 SCC 727 : (1994 AIR SCW 1050 : AIR 1994 SC 1074 : 1994 Lab IC 762) and the decision in Ram Kishan V. Union of India (1995) 6 SCC 157 :(1995 AIR SCW 4027 : AIR 1996 SC 255), has held that (AIR 1998 SC 2713 : 1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009, para 17) :
State Of Assam & Another vs Bimal Kumar Pandit on 12 February, 1963
"30. Recently, a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Punjab National Bank V. Kunj Behari Mishra (1998) 7 SCC 84 : AIR 1998 SC 2713: (1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009), relying upon the earlier decisions of this Court in State of Assam V. Bimal Kumar Pandit (1964) 2 SCR 1 : AIR 1963 SC 1612; Institute of Chartered Accountants of India V. L. K. Ratna (1986) 4 SCC 537 : (AIR 1987 SC 71) as also the Constitution Bench decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad V. B. Karunakar (1993) 4 SCC 727 : (1994 AIR SCW 1050 : AIR 1994 SC 1074 : 1994 Lab IC 762) and the decision in Ram Kishan V. Union of India (1995) 6 SCC 157 :(1995 AIR SCW 4027 : AIR 1996 SC 255), has held that (AIR 1998 SC 2713 : 1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009, para 17) :
Institute Of Chartered Accountants vs L.K. Ratna & Others on 21 October, 1986
"30. Recently, a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Punjab National Bank V. Kunj Behari Mishra (1998) 7 SCC 84 : AIR 1998 SC 2713: (1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009), relying upon the earlier decisions of this Court in State of Assam V. Bimal Kumar Pandit (1964) 2 SCR 1 : AIR 1963 SC 1612; Institute of Chartered Accountants of India V. L. K. Ratna (1986) 4 SCC 537 : (AIR 1987 SC 71) as also the Constitution Bench decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad V. B. Karunakar (1993) 4 SCC 727 : (1994 AIR SCW 1050 : AIR 1994 SC 1074 : 1994 Lab IC 762) and the decision in Ram Kishan V. Union of India (1995) 6 SCC 157 :(1995 AIR SCW 4027 : AIR 1996 SC 255), has held that (AIR 1998 SC 2713 : 1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009, para 17) :
Yoginath D. Bagde vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 16 September, 1999
In Yoginath D. Bagde Vs. State of Maharashtra and another, AIR 1999 S.C. 3734 after referring several earlier decisions in para 30 to 33 Apex Court observed as under:-
Ram Kishan vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 September, 1995
"30. Recently, a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Punjab National Bank V. Kunj Behari Mishra (1998) 7 SCC 84 : AIR 1998 SC 2713: (1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009), relying upon the earlier decisions of this Court in State of Assam V. Bimal Kumar Pandit (1964) 2 SCR 1 : AIR 1963 SC 1612; Institute of Chartered Accountants of India V. L. K. Ratna (1986) 4 SCC 537 : (AIR 1987 SC 71) as also the Constitution Bench decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad V. B. Karunakar (1993) 4 SCC 727 : (1994 AIR SCW 1050 : AIR 1994 SC 1074 : 1994 Lab IC 762) and the decision in Ram Kishan V. Union of India (1995) 6 SCC 157 :(1995 AIR SCW 4027 : AIR 1996 SC 255), has held that (AIR 1998 SC 2713 : 1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009, para 17) :
State Bank Of India vs S.S.Koshal on 12 January, 1994
32. The Court further held that the contrary view expressed by this Court in State Bank of India V. S.S. Koshal, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 468: (1994 AIR SCW 2901) and State of Rajasthan V. M.C. Saxena (1998) 3 SCC 385 : (1998 AIR SCW 965 : AIR 1998 SC 1150 : 1998 Lab IC 1038) was not correct.
State Of Rajasthan vs M.C. Saxena on 24 February, 1998
32. The Court further held that the contrary view expressed by this Court in State Bank of India V. S.S. Koshal, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 468: (1994 AIR SCW 2901) and State of Rajasthan V. M.C. Saxena (1998) 3 SCC 385 : (1998 AIR SCW 965 : AIR 1998 SC 1150 : 1998 Lab IC 1038) was not correct.
Managing Director Ecil Hyderabad Etc. ... vs B. Karunakar Etc. Etc on 1 October, 1993
"30. Recently, a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Punjab National Bank V. Kunj Behari Mishra (1998) 7 SCC 84 : AIR 1998 SC 2713: (1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009), relying upon the earlier decisions of this Court in State of Assam V. Bimal Kumar Pandit (1964) 2 SCR 1 : AIR 1963 SC 1612; Institute of Chartered Accountants of India V. L. K. Ratna (1986) 4 SCC 537 : (AIR 1987 SC 71) as also the Constitution Bench decision in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad V. B. Karunakar (1993) 4 SCC 727 : (1994 AIR SCW 1050 : AIR 1994 SC 1074 : 1994 Lab IC 762) and the decision in Ram Kishan V. Union of India (1995) 6 SCC 157 :(1995 AIR SCW 4027 : AIR 1996 SC 255), has held that (AIR 1998 SC 2713 : 1998 AIR SCW 2762 : 1998 Lab IC 3012 : 1998 All LJ 2009, para 17) :
1