Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.46 seconds)
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Sunita And Ors. ... on 20 August, 2024 cites

Mukund Dewangan vs Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd on 11 February, 2016

13. Hence, in wake of the discussion made herein above, and applying the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mukund Dewangan (supra) and also looking to the observation made by the Larger Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Bajaj Allianz (supra); that the judgment of the three Judge Bench in the case of Mukund Dewangan (supra) shall continue to hold the field till the issue involved in M/s Bajaj Allianz (supra) is not adjudicated upon, the instant misc. appeals stand dismissed as being devoid of any merit. No order as to costs. Record be returned to the learned Tribunal forthwith.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 2801 - A Mishra - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Smt. Rambha Devi & Ors on 3 November, 2015

13. Hence, in wake of the discussion made herein above, and applying the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mukund Dewangan (supra) and also looking to the observation made by the Larger Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Bajaj Allianz (supra); that the judgment of the three Judge Bench in the case of Mukund Dewangan (supra) shall continue to hold the field till the issue involved in M/s Bajaj Allianz (supra) is not adjudicated upon, the instant misc. appeals stand dismissed as being devoid of any merit. No order as to costs. Record be returned to the learned Tribunal forthwith.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 0 - Cited by 66 - V Bishnoi - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

5. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the compensation deserves to be enhanced in light of judgment passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the cases of National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. reported in (2017)16 SCC 680 and Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation reported in AIR 2009 SC 3104. The learned counsel for the parties were directed to submit calculation of compensation to be awarded to the claimants afresh. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to modify the judgment and award (Downloaded on 21/08/2024 at 08:39:43 PM) [2024:RJ-JD:34352] (9 of 10) [CMA-1770/2015] passed by the learned Tribunal while taking into consideration the monthly income at Rs.7520/- of the deceased, inasmuch as he was working as TR FMS Engineer. The claimants are held entitled to receive compensation under the heads of consortium @48000/- each, Rs.18,000/- under the head of loss of estate and Rs.18,000/- under the head of funeral expenses. The the compensation is, accordingly, re-quantified as under:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

5. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the compensation deserves to be enhanced in light of judgment passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the cases of National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. reported in (2017)16 SCC 680 and Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation reported in AIR 2009 SC 3104. The learned counsel for the parties were directed to submit calculation of compensation to be awarded to the claimants afresh. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to modify the judgment and award (Downloaded on 21/08/2024 at 08:39:43 PM) [2024:RJ-JD:34352] (9 of 10) [CMA-1770/2015] passed by the learned Tribunal while taking into consideration the monthly income at Rs.7520/- of the deceased, inasmuch as he was working as TR FMS Engineer. The claimants are held entitled to receive compensation under the heads of consortium @48000/- each, Rs.18,000/- under the head of loss of estate and Rs.18,000/- under the head of funeral expenses. The the compensation is, accordingly, re-quantified as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next