Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.23 seconds)
Sri Mathranda M Kishore vs Mathranda C Uthappa @ Vitala on 14 July, 2023 cites

New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt Ltd on 4 March, 2020

11. I have gone through principles laid down in all the rulings relied by both the parties. The rulings relied by -6- NC: 2023:KHC:24698 WP No. 7448 of 2020 counsel for the plaintiffs is to the effect that there is a legislative mandate that written statement should be filed within 30 days and at the most it can be extended for a further period of 60 days and no more. On the other hand principles laid down in rulings relied by learned counsel for the defendants is to the effect that order VIII rule 1 of CPC are directory in nature and not mandatory.
Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 272 - V Saran - Full Document

Salem Advocate Bar Association,Tamil ... vs Union Of India on 2 August, 2005

In the background of the principles laid down in the above said rulings, it is pertinent to note that it is an admitted facts that there is delay in filing written statement. However issues are not yet framed as other defendants have filed written statement and present applications are moved before framing of issues. The defendants are contending that they were prevented from filing the written
Supreme Court of India Cites 50 - Cited by 1674 - T Chatterjee - Full Document

Radhey Shyam & Anr vs Chhabi Nath & Ors on 26 February, 2015

4. A perusal of the material on record including the impugned order passed by the Trial Court will indicate that the same does not suffer from any illegality and infirmity nor can the same be said to be capricious or perverse occasioning failure of justice warranting interference of this Court in exercise of its powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, as held by the Apex Court in the case of Radhey Shyam Vs. Chhabi Nath reported in (2015) 5 SCC 423.
Supreme Court of India Cites 53 - Cited by 616 - A K Goel - Full Document
1   2 Next