Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.21 seconds)Sh. Ranbir Singh vs Financial Commissioner And Secretary ... on 20 February, 1998
9. The said view was, thereafter, followed by another Division
Bench in Ranbir Singh Vs. Financial Commissioner, Haryana & others
2005 (3) PLR 519 by holding that when a partition is complete and the
instrument of partition, namely, sanad takseem is drawn up, no remedy of
appeal is provided. Relevant observations reads as under:
Bachan Singh vs Swaran Singh on 6 March, 2000
The said
view was followed by a Division Bench in Bachan Singh Vs. Swaran
Singh 2000 (3) PLR 416 and thereafter, a five Judge Bench of this Court, in
Ram Chander Vs. Bhim Singh & others 2008 (3) PLR 747 keeping in
mind that there was apparent difference of opinion between two Full Bench
judgments, held that in joint property, vendees' community of interest and
commonality of possession could not claim any particular portion of the
property till such time it remained joint and up-held the view recorded in
CWP No.5872 of 1989 11
Bhartu's case (supra) and over-ruled in judgment of Lachhman Singh Vs.
Pritam Chand 1970 PLR 341.
Ram Chander vs Bhim Singh And Others on 1 November, 2012
The said
view was followed by a Division Bench in Bachan Singh Vs. Swaran
Singh 2000 (3) PLR 416 and thereafter, a five Judge Bench of this Court, in
Ram Chander Vs. Bhim Singh & others 2008 (3) PLR 747 keeping in
mind that there was apparent difference of opinion between two Full Bench
judgments, held that in joint property, vendees' community of interest and
commonality of possession could not claim any particular portion of the
property till such time it remained joint and up-held the view recorded in
CWP No.5872 of 1989 11
Bhartu's case (supra) and over-ruled in judgment of Lachhman Singh Vs.
Pritam Chand 1970 PLR 341.
Lachhman Singh Sunder Singh vs Pritam Chand Kirpa Mal And Anr. on 22 December, 1960
The said
view was followed by a Division Bench in Bachan Singh Vs. Swaran
Singh 2000 (3) PLR 416 and thereafter, a five Judge Bench of this Court, in
Ram Chander Vs. Bhim Singh & others 2008 (3) PLR 747 keeping in
mind that there was apparent difference of opinion between two Full Bench
judgments, held that in joint property, vendees' community of interest and
commonality of possession could not claim any particular portion of the
property till such time it remained joint and up-held the view recorded in
CWP No.5872 of 1989 11
Bhartu's case (supra) and over-ruled in judgment of Lachhman Singh Vs.
Pritam Chand 1970 PLR 341.