Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.42 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Notaries Act, 1952
Basalingappa vs Mudibasappa on 9 April, 2019
37. The principles with respect to above mentioned
presumptions, have been succinctly laid down in Para 25 of the
judgment by Hon'ble apex court in Basalingappa v.
Mudibasappa (2019) 5 SCC 418, which lays down as under
" 25.1. Once the execution of cheque is admitted
Section 139 of the Act mandates a presumption that
the cheque was for the discharge of any debt or other
liability. Digitally
signed by
ROHIT
ROHIT KUMAR
KUMAR Date:
Section 315 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sri K V S Prakash vs Mr P K Sundaraj on 8 August, 2008
41. Before parting with the judgment, it is apposite to mention
that this is settled law from case laws K Prakash Vs. T K
Sundaram (2008) 1 SCC 258, Krishna Janardhan Bhat Vs.
Dattatraya G Hegde AIR 2008 SC 1325 which provide that the
burden of proof upon the accused in cases u/s 138 of the N I Act,
has to be discharged as per the standards of 'preponderance of
probabilities', while, the complainant has to prove his case
'beyond reasonable doubt'.