Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.23 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
K.Venkataramiah vs A. Seetharama Reddy & Ors on 12 February, 1963
The Court should exercise such power when on examining the evidence as it stands, some inherent lacuna or defect becomes apparent This decision was followed in the case of K. Venkatramiah v. A. Seetharama in .
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 4 in The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. [Entire Act]
Section 22 in The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. [Entire Act]
B. Banerjee vs Anita Pan on 20 November, 1974
v. Anita Pan's case (supra), the Supreme Court gave an opportunity to make an amendment of the plaint. Hence for the ends of justice an opportunity would be given to the plaintiff to amend the plaint in this respect. The defendant will be given a chance to file additional written statement. Thereafter further evidence will have to be taken by the Court of first instance.
The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956.
Provash Chandra Chatterjee vs Chand Mohan Basak on 13 May, 1977
In the Bench case of Provash Chandra v. Chand Mohan in , it has been stated that in view of the amended provisions of Section 13 (1) (ff) of the Act, the plaintiff is required to plead and prove that he is not in possession of any reasonably suitable accommodation elsewhere apart from the disputed premises. But the plaint cannot be thrown away on that ground alone. Though such averment did not appear in the plaint of B. Banerjee.