Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.31 seconds)The Hindu Minority And Guardianship Act, 1956
The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Roxann Sharma vs Arun Sharma on 17 February, 2015
In this connection, reference may be made to the decision of the Supreme Court in Roxann Sharma v. Arun Sharma, (2015) 8 SCC 318, where it has been held:
Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mrs. Elizabeth Dinshaw vs Arvand M. Dinshaw And Anr on 11 November, 1986
"10. It is too late in the day to urge that a writ of habeas corpus is not maintainable if the child is in the custody of another parent. The law in this regard has developed a lot over a period of time but now it is a settled position that the court can invoke its extraordinary writ jurisdiction for the best interest of the child. This has been done in Elizabeth Dinshaw v. Arvand M. Dinshaw [Elizabeth Dinshaw v. Arvand M. Dinshaw, (1987) 1 SCC 42 : 1987 SCC (Cri) 13] , Nithya Anand Raghavan v. State (NCT of Delhi) [Nithya Anand Raghavan v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2017) 8 SCC 454 : (2017) 4 SCC (Civ) 104] and Lahari Sakhamuri v. Sobhan Kodali [Lahari Sakhamuri v. Sobhan Kodali, (2019) 7 SCC 311 : (2019) 3 SCC (Civ) 590] among others. In all these cases, the writ petitions were entertained. Therefore, we reject the contention of the appellant wife that the writ petition before the High Court of Rajasthan was not maintainable."