cites: 145828566

Nand Kumar Manjhi And Anr, Etc vs The State Of Bihar Etc on 22 April, 2019

The he applicants contend that the Nand Kumari Manjhi & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar (2019) judgment is not applicable to thei their case, as granting seniority from the date of initial appointment would not adversely affect anyone.

Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 12 - I Malhotra - Full Document

Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 12191

Rashi Mani Mishra And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And 60 Others on 19 September, 2016

regularization. This argument is also bolstered by other relevant judgments (OA No. 2658/2016 and WP(C) No.5429/1998). The applicants refute the respondents' reliance on the judgment in Rishi Mani Mishra & Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (28.07.2021), (28.07.2021), stating that it actually supports their case. The ruling states that long-term long term adhoc appointments should not be treated as temporary or stopgap measures, which is applicable to the applicants' case. Furthermore, the rules cited in the case do not apply to the applicants, who do not face any rule denying seniority from the date of initial appointment.

Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Om Prakash Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 20 July, 2010

Item No.40/C-5 O.A. No.2028/2017 4.4 Learned counsel for the applicant further drew a reference to the decision rendered by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in WP(C) No.5429/1998 dated 13.07.2010 in the case c of Om Prakash Singh & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. For the sake of better appreciation, the relevant para of the judgment is reproduced herein below:

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 8 - D Bhandari - Full Document

D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.15422/2009 vs The High Court Of Judicature For ... on 7 April, 2015

6.4 In Writ Petition (Civil) No. 49 of 2022 - C. Yamini & Others vs. The High Court for the State of Andhra Pradesh at Amravathi & Anr Anr., decided on 23.02.2023, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that services rendered on an ad hoc basis as a Judicial Officer cannot be be counted for the purpose of seniority. The relevant portion of the judgment reads as under:

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 73 - A Rastogi - Full Document

The Secretary To Government Department ... vs K. C. Devaki on 3 February, 2023

6.5 In a recent nt decision in Civil Appeal No. 4356 of 2025 arising out of SLP (C) No. 2793 of 2023 - The Secretary to Government, Department of Health & Family Welfare & Anr. vs. K.C. Devaki Devaki, decided on 25.03.2025, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under:

Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search