Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (1.90 seconds)Manjit vs Union Of India on 29 January, 2021
While noticing the above backdrop,
the three judge Bench of this Court in Manjit (supra)
clearly noted that the Scheme provided an avenue for
backdoor entry into service and was contrary to the
mandate of Article 16 which guarantees equal
opportunity in matters of public employment. In this
backdrop, the impugned judgment of the High Court of
Madras issuing a mandamus for the appointment of the
respondent cannot be sustained."
Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Choudhary vs State Of Chhattisgarh 34 Wa/169/2019 ... on 17 May, 2019
13. Learned counsels for the respondents have also placed
before us the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of
Jharkhand at Ranchi in the case of Rajendra Choudhary
and Ors. vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors. [WP (S)
No. 3231 of 2019] decided on 20.03.2023, the relevant
portion of the same reads as under: -
The State Of Manipur vs Surjakumar Okram on 1 February, 2022
"28. The principles that can be deduced from the law laid
down by this Court, as referred to above, are:
Court In The Case Of Secretary, State Of ... vs . Uma on 9 April, 2015
In the light of the above, it is crystal clear that not
only the termination of the LARSGESS Scheme attained
finality, the issue of all the pending claims invoking to the
Scheme have also been adjudicated upon in subsequent
pronouncements whereby all the claims based on the above
Scheme have been closed and any appointment if allowed
to be made in pursuance to the above Scheme is not only
void (since the same has been considered and declined by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court as mentioned in preceding
paras) but would also amount to back door entry into the
service of the Railways as it is against the constitutional
scheme and also against the ratio as set out by the Hon'ble
Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
case of State of Karnataka vs. Uma Devi, reported in
(2006) 4 SCC 1.
Union Of India vs Kala Singh on 6 March, 2019
9. Consequently, it appears that an application (IA No.
18573/2019, in Miscellaneous Application No(s). 346/2019
in Miscellaneous Application No(s). 1202/2018 in Petition
for Special Leave to Appeal No.508/2018) was moved
before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India v. Kala
Singh, 2019 SCC Online SC 1965 . By an order dated 6
March 2019, a two-Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court observed as follows:-
1