Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.17 seconds)Section 42 in Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Bihar Excise Act, 1915
Section 46 in Bihar Excise Act, 1915 [Entire Act]
Section 46 in Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 42 in The Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
M/S Bachan Traders vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 31 March, 2009
12. The Division Bench in the case of M/s Bachhan
Traders (supra) held that the aforesaid clause 12 of the tender
notice does not sanction forfeiture of licence fee and for forfeiture
of the security deposit the certificate submitted with the tender
should have been found to be forged (farzi). We are in agreement
with the aforesaid views of the Division Bench and hence, we also
Patna High Court CWJC No.1117 of 2009 dt.13-09-2012
11/ 12
come to the conclusion that there is no legal sanction for forfeiture
of the security deposit or the licence fee in the present two cases.
The decision of the concerned District Magistrates not to refund the
licence fees for the year 2001- 02 deposited in advance by the
petitioner Ashok Kumar cannot be sustained in law. We hold him
entitled to refund of the licence fee deposited by him for that period
as well as the security amount. The concerned District Magistrates
may either refund to him the amounts of licence fee and the security
deposit or adjust the amounts against government dues including
sales tax, if any. If after adjustment any refundable amount remains
payable the same should be paid to him within two months from
today.
1