Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.45 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Nr Portfolio Pvt Ltd. on 22 November, 2013

The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Chuhar Mal V CIT (supra) held that what was meant by saying that evidence Act did not apply to the proceedings under Income­tax Act,1961, was that the rigors of Rules of evidence, contained in the Evidence Act was not applicable; but that did not mean that when the taxing authorities were desirous of invoking the principles of Evidence Act, in proceedings before them, they were prevented from doing so. It was further held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that all that Section 110 of the Evidence Act, 1872 did, was to embody a salutary principle of common law, jurisprudence viz, where a person was found in possessing of anything, the onus of proving that he was not its owner, was on that person. Thus, this principle could be attracted to a set of circumstances that satisfies its conditions and was applicable to taxing proceedings.
Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 199 - S Khanna - Full Document
1   2 Next