Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.24 seconds)Section 3 in Telangana Town-Planning Act, 1920 [Entire Act]
Telangana Town-Planning Act, 1920
Bangalore Development Authority & ... vs R. Hanumaiah & Others on 3 October, 2005
It was issued by the Revenue Department under Revenue Book Circular
Four-1. Evidently therefor not decision has been taken by the State in terms
of the provisions of the 1960 Act or the 1973 Act. The concerned Ministry
was Ministry of Housing and Environment. The jurisdiction of the State
while exercising the power to issue direction in this behalf is extremely
limited as has been noticed by this Court in Rakesh Ranjan Verma and
Others v. State of Bihar and Others [1992 Supp (2) SCC 343 at 348], U.P.
State Electricity Board v. Ram Autar and Another [(1996) 8 SCC 506],
Bangalore Development Authority (supra), para 55 and State of U.P. v.
Neeraj Awasthi [2005 (10) SCALE 286].
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd vs Darius Shapur Chenai & Ors on 20 September, 2005
"Recently in Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs.
Darius Shapur Chenai & Ors. [2005 (7) SCALE
386], this Court noticed:
Commissioner Of Police, Bombay vs Gordhandas Bhanji on 23 November, 1951
Referring to Gordhandas Bhanji (supra), it
was further observed :
Bahadursinh Lakhubhai Gohil vs Jagdishbhai M. Kamalia And Ors on 17 December, 2003
[The said decisions have been followed by
this Court in Bahadursinh Lakhubhai Gohil Vs.
Jagdishbhai M. Kamalia and Others [(2004) 2 SCC
65]."
Friends Colony Development Committee vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 1 November, 2004
In Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa and
Others [(2004) 8 SCC 733], this Court observed:
Rakesh Ranjan Verma And Ors. Etc. Etc vs State Of Bihar And Ors. Etc. Etc on 10 April, 1992
It was issued by the Revenue Department under Revenue Book Circular
Four-1. Evidently therefor not decision has been taken by the State in terms
of the provisions of the 1960 Act or the 1973 Act. The concerned Ministry
was Ministry of Housing and Environment. The jurisdiction of the State
while exercising the power to issue direction in this behalf is extremely
limited as has been noticed by this Court in Rakesh Ranjan Verma and
Others v. State of Bihar and Others [1992 Supp (2) SCC 343 at 348], U.P.
State Electricity Board v. Ram Autar and Another [(1996) 8 SCC 506],
Bangalore Development Authority (supra), para 55 and State of U.P. v.
Neeraj Awasthi [2005 (10) SCALE 286].
State Of U.P vs Neeraj Awasthi & Others on 16 December, 2005
It was issued by the Revenue Department under Revenue Book Circular
Four-1. Evidently therefor not decision has been taken by the State in terms
of the provisions of the 1960 Act or the 1973 Act. The concerned Ministry
was Ministry of Housing and Environment. The jurisdiction of the State
while exercising the power to issue direction in this behalf is extremely
limited as has been noticed by this Court in Rakesh Ranjan Verma and
Others v. State of Bihar and Others [1992 Supp (2) SCC 343 at 348], U.P.
State Electricity Board v. Ram Autar and Another [(1996) 8 SCC 506],
Bangalore Development Authority (supra), para 55 and State of U.P. v.
Neeraj Awasthi [2005 (10) SCALE 286].