Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (1.34 seconds)
Nitesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 7 February, 2025 cites

Union Of India vs Ramesh Ram & Ors on 7 May, 2010

54. It is submitted by Mr. Verma that the ratio of Ramesh Ram (supra) would not be applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case. The examination was held in the instant case only in respect of one cadre and post of Assistant Engineers having same pay-scale and status. Ramesh Ram's judgement has dealt with UPSC examination where different cadres of posts are required to be filled up, viz., IAS, IFS, IPS, allied Central Services and even Group-B services consisting of different cadres. In such examination, if preference based allotment and distribution of merit-list on the basis of MRC and filling up of the vacant seats taken by MRCs by the unreserved candidates, are not taken into Patna High Court CWJC No.1945 of 2022 dt.07-02-2025 48/56 consideration, there would be topsy turvy situation with regard to the principles of reservation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 147 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document

Kumar Gaurav Singh vs The Bihar Staff Selection Commission on 17 October, 2023

63. The learned Additional Advocate General as well as the learned Sr. Advocate appearing on behalf of the B.P.S.C. have strongly relied on the Division Bench's judgement of Kumar Gaurav Singh (supra). It is submitted by them that the examination was held in respect of one cadre of Assistant Engineer (Civil). According to their merit, they had the chance only to occupy a particular department on the basis of merit. As for example, if an MRC is of the view that the Department of Road Construction is most preferential department for him and by virtue of his merit he is entitled to be appointed in Road Construction Department, he would be appointed in that department but this does not mean that the consequent vacancy would go to the lesser meritorious candidate in unreserved pool.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Ritesh R. Sah vs Dr. Y.L. Yamul & Ors on 15 February, 1996

65. It is needless to say that both Ritesh R. Sah (supra) and Tripurari Sharan (supra) are decisions on the point of determination of seats in medical colleges in between MRCs, reserved candidates and unreserved candidates. The above- mentioned judgements were delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court taking into consideration that none of the contesting parties would be refused to get a chance in a medical college of the country on the basis of their acquiring cut-off mark. The inter se dispute is with regard to admission in a college of preference by MRC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 463 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Tripurari Sharan And Anr. vs Ranjit Kumar Yadav . on 11 January, 2018

65. It is needless to say that both Ritesh R. Sah (supra) and Tripurari Sharan (supra) are decisions on the point of determination of seats in medical colleges in between MRCs, reserved candidates and unreserved candidates. The above- mentioned judgements were delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court taking into consideration that none of the contesting parties would be refused to get a chance in a medical college of the country on the basis of their acquiring cut-off mark. The inter se dispute is with regard to admission in a college of preference by MRC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 32 - M M Shantanagoudar - Full Document

Dega Venkata Harsha Vardhan vs Akula Venkata Harshavardhan on 24 August, 2018

In the aforesaid decision, the Division Bench of this Court had dealt with the applicability of the ratio laid down in Ritesh R. Sah (supra), Tripurari Sharan (supra), Dega Venkata Harsha Vardhan v. Akula Ventaka Harshavardhan [(2019) 12 SCC 735], which relate to admission to academic institutions, and Union of India v. Ramesh Ram (supra) followed by Alok Kumar Pandit v. State of Assam [(2012) 13 SCC 516], with respect to appointment to civil services.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Alok Kumar Pandit vs State Of Assam & Ors on 26 November, 2012

In the aforesaid decision, the Division Bench of this Court had dealt with the applicability of the ratio laid down in Ritesh R. Sah (supra), Tripurari Sharan (supra), Dega Venkata Harsha Vardhan v. Akula Ventaka Harshavardhan [(2019) 12 SCC 735], which relate to admission to academic institutions, and Union of India v. Ramesh Ram (supra) followed by Alok Kumar Pandit v. State of Assam [(2012) 13 SCC 516], with respect to appointment to civil services.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 18 - Full Document
1   2 Next