Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.38 seconds)

State Of Rajasthan vs Fateh Chand Soni on 12 December, 1995

In taking this view, I am fortified by the judgments relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner namely State of Rajasthan v. Fateh Chand Soni [1996 (1) SCC 562], Ram Prasad and Others v. D.K.Vijay and Others [1999 (7) SCC 251] and Union of India v. Pushpa Rani [2008 (9) SCC 242] all of which deal with the issue of whether a movement from one scale to the next higher scale of pay pursuant to the grant of a higher grade to the employee amounted to a promotion or a mere grant of higher grade for the purposes of implementing the policy of reservation of posts for Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Candidates. The decisions referred to indicate that, where the movements aforesaid have the effect of placing the employee in a higher scale, consequent to a process of selection, then the movement is to be treated as a promotion. Resultantly, I quash Ext.P13 audit objection of the 3rd respondent and allow the writ petition by declaring that the service benefits due to the petitioner shall be as contemplated in Ext.P12 order issued by the 1st respondent University.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 94 - S C Agrawal - Full Document

Union Of India vs Pushpa Rani & Ors on 29 July, 2008

In taking this view, I am fortified by the judgments relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner namely State of Rajasthan v. Fateh Chand Soni [1996 (1) SCC 562], Ram Prasad and Others v. D.K.Vijay and Others [1999 (7) SCC 251] and Union of India v. Pushpa Rani [2008 (9) SCC 242] all of which deal with the issue of whether a movement from one scale to the next higher scale of pay pursuant to the grant of a higher grade to the employee amounted to a promotion or a mere grant of higher grade for the purposes of implementing the policy of reservation of posts for Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Candidates. The decisions referred to indicate that, where the movements aforesaid have the effect of placing the employee in a higher scale, consequent to a process of selection, then the movement is to be treated as a promotion. Resultantly, I quash Ext.P13 audit objection of the 3rd respondent and allow the writ petition by declaring that the service benefits due to the petitioner shall be as contemplated in Ext.P12 order issued by the 1st respondent University.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 263 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1