Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.26 seconds)Section 19 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Steel Authority Of India Ltd. & Ors. ... vs National Union Water Front Workers & Ors on 30 August, 2001
It was held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the
Management of Ashok Hotel Vs. Their Workman and Anr. WP(C)
No.14828/2006 decided on 19.02.2013 that perusal of decision of
the Constitution Bench in Steal Authority of India and Ors. Vs.
National Union Waterfront Workers and Ors, 2001(7) SCC 1
makes it amply clear that even where the work of an establishment
is carried out by employment of contract labour prohibited because
of the notification issued under Section 10(1) of the CLRA Act, no
automatic absorption of the contract labour can be ordered.
Section 7 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Radhey Shyam & Others vs U.P.Jal Nigam & Others on 3 April, 2013
16. It is correct that it is mentioned in termination letter
Ex.WW1/M1(3) (placed in connected case titled as Radhey Shyam
Vs. Delhi Jal Board & Ors.) that coemployee Radhey Shyam's
contract agreement with management No.3 was for one year and the
project was reaching to the completion stage and hence, his service
was no more required. Copy of termination letter has not been filed
by management and so, it cannot be known whether such document
was bearing the signature of the claimant or not.