Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.33 seconds)Pimpri Chinchwad New Township ... vs Vishnudev Cooperative Housing Society on 3 August, 2018
Shanti Sports Club & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 August, 2009
Shanti Sports Club Vs. Union of India [(2009) 15 SCC
705];
Murari & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 November, 1996
Murari Vs. Union of India [(1997) 1 SCC 15];
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs Umashankar Rajabhau And Ors on 9 November, 1995
State of Maharashtra Vs. Umashankar Rajabhau
[(1996) 1 SCC 299] &
Satendra Prasad Jain And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others on 16 September, 1993
Satendra Prasad Jain Vs. State of U.P. [(1993) 4 SCC
369]
Section 92 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Suraj Narain And Anr. vs Mangilal And Ors. on 25 January, 1972
6. The judgment and decree dated 16.12.1967 was challenged
by the defendant No.2 Durga Devi as well as defendant No.3 Suraj
Narain, by way of filing two separate D.B Civil Special Appeals
No.4 & 5 of 1968 before the Division Bench. Both appeals were
heard and decided on merits vide common judgment dated
25.01.1972, affirming the judgment and decree dated
16.12.1967. The judgment of Division Bench is reported in [RLW
(Downloaded on 23/12/2022 at 09:48:18 PM)
(6 of 21) [CFA-425/2014]
(1972) Raj. 201] titled Suraj Narain Vs. Mangilal. Thus, the
judgment and decree dated 16.12.1967 has attained finality.
Counsel for both parties states that the original record of suit is
not available hence facts have been gathered as statements in
judgments and memo of appeals.
Section 29 in Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Mangilal vs Smt. Durga Devi And Ors. on 16 December, 1967
21. From the record it appears that in respect of suit property of
trust, the civil suit was laid way back on 05.10.1953 for seeking
removal of the then trustees as much as for declaration of gift
deed executed by trustee Ramjilal (defendant No.1) in favour of
his wife as null and void and for appointment of new trustees to
manage and use the suit property for the purpose of trust, was
initially dismissed by the trial court vide judgment dated
04.03.1960 and thereagainst, S.B. Civil Regular Appeal
No.94/1960 titled Mangilal Vs. Durga Devi was instituted before
the High Court. The first appeal was allowed and while setting
aside the judgment and decree of trial court, suit was decreed
vide judgment and decree dated 16.12.1967 and as reflect from
the judgment that the trustee Ramjilal has already passed away,
other trustees defendant No.2 Suraj Narain, trustee Sundarlal
were ordered to be removed and new trustees were ordered to be
appointed by the District Judge as well as defendants were
directed to deliver the possession of suit property to the newly
appointed trustees. The judgment and decree dated 16.12.1967
has attained finality after affirming by the Division Bench vide
judgment and decree dated 25.01.1972. It is not in dispute that
as far as appointment of new trustees is concerned, in compliance
thereof, new trustees have been appointed by the Additional
District Judge, Gangapur City vide order dated 12.02.1969.
Among the newly appointed trustees, SDM, Gangapur City is ex
officio manager trustee who has been entrusted to take charge of
the trust property and manage the same in the interest of public
(Downloaded on 23/12/2022 at 09:48:18 PM)
(16 of 21) [CFA-425/2014]
as well as for the residence of travelers and sanyasis. The
execution of judgment and decree dated 16.12.1967, to the
extent of removal of objectors (present appellants herein) is
pending.