Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.18 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Delhi Municipal Karamchari Ekta Union ... vs P.L. Sngh & Ors on 7 December, 1987
6. It is now well settled, and it has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents, that a daily wager who works for more than 240 days in a year in an industry has to be regarded as having been regularly appointed. The services of such an employee is liable to be regularised and in this connection the following decisions of the Supreme Court may be noticed : Daily Rated Casual Labour employed under P & T v. Union of India & others (1988-I-LLJ-370); U.P. Income Tax Department Contingent Paid Staff Welfare Association v. Union of India & others (1988-I-LLJ-396); Delhi Municipal Karamchari Ekta Union v. P. L. Singh & others 1988(56) F.L.R. 209 (S.C.); The General Secretary, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna v. The Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Patna & others (1988-II-LLJ-109) and Business Combine Limited v. M. N. Jagtap & others 1988 (1) J.T.SC. 30. In all these cases it was held by the Supreme Court that when an employee has served for a number of years without break, the person was entitled to be regularised and appropriate directions were issued direction the promulgation of the scheme for regularisation of the services of those persons.
Sabhajit Tewary vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 February, 1975
It is no doubt true that in Sabhajit Tewary's case it was held by the Supreme Court that the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research was not an instrumentality of the State, but as has been held in the case if Ajay Hasia, etc, v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & others (1981-I-LLJ-103), while dealing with the case of Sabhajit Tewary, that the decisions of the Supreme Court in Sabhajit Tewary's case turned on the activities of that Institute.
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Daily Rated Casual Labour ... vs Union Of India & Others on 27 October, 1987
6. It is now well settled, and it has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents, that a daily wager who works for more than 240 days in a year in an industry has to be regarded as having been regularly appointed. The services of such an employee is liable to be regularised and in this connection the following decisions of the Supreme Court may be noticed : Daily Rated Casual Labour employed under P & T v. Union of India & others (1988-I-LLJ-370); U.P. Income Tax Department Contingent Paid Staff Welfare Association v. Union of India & others (1988-I-LLJ-396); Delhi Municipal Karamchari Ekta Union v. P. L. Singh & others 1988(56) F.L.R. 209 (S.C.); The General Secretary, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna v. The Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Patna & others (1988-II-LLJ-109) and Business Combine Limited v. M. N. Jagtap & others 1988 (1) J.T.SC. 30. In all these cases it was held by the Supreme Court that when an employee has served for a number of years without break, the person was entitled to be regularised and appropriate directions were issued direction the promulgation of the scheme for regularisation of the services of those persons.
The Societies Registration Act, 1860
U.P. Income-Tax Department Contingent ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 4 December, 1987
6. It is now well settled, and it has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents, that a daily wager who works for more than 240 days in a year in an industry has to be regarded as having been regularly appointed. The services of such an employee is liable to be regularised and in this connection the following decisions of the Supreme Court may be noticed : Daily Rated Casual Labour employed under P & T v. Union of India & others (1988-I-LLJ-370); U.P. Income Tax Department Contingent Paid Staff Welfare Association v. Union of India & others (1988-I-LLJ-396); Delhi Municipal Karamchari Ekta Union v. P. L. Singh & others 1988(56) F.L.R. 209 (S.C.); The General Secretary, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna v. The Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Patna & others (1988-II-LLJ-109) and Business Combine Limited v. M. N. Jagtap & others 1988 (1) J.T.SC. 30. In all these cases it was held by the Supreme Court that when an employee has served for a number of years without break, the person was entitled to be regularised and appropriate directions were issued direction the promulgation of the scheme for regularisation of the services of those persons.
1