Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.30 seconds)
M/S Multitech Automation vs The State Of Rajasthan on 12 May, 2025 cites

Oil & Natural Gas Corpn.Ltd vs Western Geco International Ltd on 4 September, 2014

State of Rajasthan & Ors. : AIR 1995 Raj. 151, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Western Geco International Ltd. : (2014) 9 SCC 263, Manoharlal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. : (2012) 13 SCC 14, D.R. Rathna Murthy v. Ramappa : (2011) 1 SCC 158, Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain & Ors. : (1975) 2 SCC 159, Chhagni Ram Gehlot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : 2017 (2) WLN 43 (Raj.), Sitements Eng. & Manfg.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 300 - T S Thakur - Full Document

D.R. Rathna Murthy vs Ramappa on 8 October, 2010

State of Rajasthan & Ors. : AIR 1995 Raj. 151, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Western Geco International Ltd. : (2014) 9 SCC 263, Manoharlal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. : (2012) 13 SCC 14, D.R. Rathna Murthy v. Ramappa : (2011) 1 SCC 158, Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain & Ors. : (1975) 2 SCC 159, Chhagni Ram Gehlot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : 2017 (2) WLN 43 (Raj.), Sitements Eng. & Manfg.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 192 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Indira Nehru Gandhi (Smt.) vs Raj Narain & Anr on 24 June, 1975

State of Rajasthan & Ors. : AIR 1995 Raj. 151, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Western Geco International Ltd. : (2014) 9 SCC 263, Manoharlal v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. : (2012) 13 SCC 14, D.R. Rathna Murthy v. Ramappa : (2011) 1 SCC 158, Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain & Ors. : (1975) 2 SCC 159, Chhagni Ram Gehlot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : 2017 (2) WLN 43 (Raj.), Sitements Eng. & Manfg.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 234 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994

25. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Private respondent- M/s Technosys Systems in S.B.C.W.P.Nos.3497/2025 and 3502/2025 submitted that the petitioner has approached this court without exhausting the statutory remedy of filing appeal, therefore, the writ petitions are not even maintainable. He further submitted, while relying upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Tata Cellular v. Union of India : (1994) 6 SCC 651, that a writ court should not interfere in the contractual matters concerning Government contracts. He further submitted that the petitioner produced false affidavit, oath certificate and has concealed material facts from the procuring entity and the said fact was admitted by the petitioner itself before the second appellate authority.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 3275 - S Mohan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next