Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.49 seconds)
Bharati Vidyapeeth vs State Of Maharashtra & Others on 29 July, 1998 cites

State Of Maharashtra vs Manubhai Pragaji Vashi & Ors on 16 August, 1995

We repeatedly asked Smt. Gokhale as to whether there was any other decision apart from the one stated in the Resolution dated 13th June, 1995 but she stated that there was none. In the preamble of the said Government Resolution what has been stated is that there was an increase in the number of people being attracted to the legal education and legal profession. The legal education is of a professional nature and, therefore, if there was increase in the facilities for legal education, there was bound to be additional financial burden on the State. Hence, it was decided that new Law Colleges should be permitted only on No Grant basis. However, since the appeal was pending before the Apex Court against the judgment of this Court in M.P. Vashi's case, if an application was made for opening of a new Law College it should be considered after the decision of the Apex Court. If in certain Districts there was not even a single Law College, then, in the interests of the public, a decision had to be taken. It is after this background stated in the preamble that the decision has been taken which we have summarised in para 24 above. In our view, there is nothing in the said G.R. dated 13th June, 1995 to suggest what has been specifically pleaded in para 5 of the affidavit of Shri Navsare.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 293 - K S Paripoornan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next