Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (1.09 seconds)
Km. Kaushal Singh vs State Of U P And 3 Others on 11 August, 2023 cites

The Bihar State Food And Civil Supplies ... vs Mahendra Pratap Singh on 17 February, 2023

The Court, thereafter, referred to the Division Bench judgments renders subsequent to the Ordinance and the Validating Act in Special Appeal Defective No. 1003 of 2020 (State of U.P. through its Secretary Foods & Civil Supplies and 2 Others Vs. Mahendra Singh), Special Appeal Defective No. 156 of 2021 (State of U.P. and 4 Others Vs. Narayan Singh Sharma). Ultimately, the Court concluded as follows in paragraph 36 of the report:-
Patna High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - A Kumar - Full Document

Dr. Sushma Chandel vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 25 August, 2021

(vi). Dr. Sushma Chandel Vs. State of U.P. and Others, 2021 SCC OnLine All 563, along with connected matters. The controversy involved in the aforesaid bunch of writ petitions as noted by the learned Single Judge was :- " The question arises whether the imposition of rider that such service to be counted has to be rendered in-between two spells of temporary or temporary and permanent service is legal and proper". Learned Single Judge referred to the provisions of Rule 3(8) of the U.P. Retirement Benefit Rules, 1961.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 6 - Y Varma - Full Document

State Of U.P. And 4 Others vs Narayan Singh Sharma on 19 February, 2021

The Court, thereafter, referred to the Division Bench judgments renders subsequent to the Ordinance and the Validating Act in Special Appeal Defective No. 1003 of 2020 (State of U.P. through its Secretary Foods & Civil Supplies and 2 Others Vs. Mahendra Singh), Special Appeal Defective No. 156 of 2021 (State of U.P. and 4 Others Vs. Narayan Singh Sharma). Ultimately, the Court concluded as follows in paragraph 36 of the report:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Smt. Gayatri Devi Sharma vs State Of U.P. And Others on 16 July, 2019

(iii). WRIT-A No. 8287 of 2021 (Smt. Gayatri Devi Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others). The petitioner approached the Court for reddressal of his grievance that the services rendered by the petitioner prior to her regularization i.e. for the period 05.01.1989 to 30.04.2012 have not been added in the qualifying service for grant of pension and other post retiral benefits.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10 - N Tiwari - Full Document

Dr. Shyam Kumar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ayush ... on 17 February, 2023

(iv). Dr. Shyam Kumar Vs. State of U.P., 2023 (3) ADJ 138 (LB). The controversy involved in the aforesaid writ petition was regarding the interpretation and application Section 2 of the U.P. Act No. 1 of 2021 i.e. U.P. Qualifying Service for Pension and Validation Act, 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to work charge employees, daily wager employees, adhoc appointee against the post as well as Seasonal Collection Amin.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 23 - V Chaudhary - Full Document

Yogendra Singh Indolia And 14 Others vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 10 February, 2020

While dealing with the case of Dr. Sushma Chandel, the Court referred to the Division Bench judgment in WRIT-A No. 26637 of 2012 (Dr. Dhirendra Prakash Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. and Others), which judgment relied upon the earlier judgment in WRIT-A No. 3201 of 1992 (Dr. Yogendra Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others). It was further observed that the judgment rendered in the case of Dr. Yogendra Singh was assailed before the Supreme Court but the Special Leave Petition was dismissed on 02.04.1998.
Allahabad High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 35 - S P Kesarwani - Full Document
1   2 Next