Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.25 seconds)The State Of Karnataka vs Sanjay Kumar Jain Etc on 11 September, 2015
8. The accused persons in their statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C., recorded
on 25.01.2018 denied the entire evidence put to them. They stated that they are
State v. Sanjay Kumar Jain and Others
FIR No. 91/01 PS: Chandni Chowk Page 6 of 22
innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case by the
complainant. Further, the accused Sanjay Kumar Jain stated that the
complainant used to raise unnecessary demands of money from him and used
to pressurize him in order to live separate from his parents. Further, he stated
that due to these circumstances, he got a heart attack on 18.11.1996 and was
hospitalized for 11 days but the complainant did not pay a single visit. He also
stated that on 06.12.1996, the complainant on her own accord left the
matrimonial house. Accused persons submitted that they did not wish to lead
defence evidence and in view of the statement given, the opportunity to lead
defence evidence was accordingly closed and matter was fixed for final
arguments.
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 494 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 109 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh vs State Of Punjab [Alongwith Criminal ... on 10 April, 1957
44. It is a cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence that prosecution is to prove
the guilt of the accused beyond the possibility of any reasonable doubt. It is also a
settled principle that thought there may be an element of truth in the prosecution
story against the accused but considered as a whole there is invariably a long
distance to travel and whole of this distance must be covered by the prosecution by
legal, trustworthy and unimpeachable evidence before an accused can be
convicted. This principle of law has been reiterated by the Hon'ble apex court in the
State v. Sanjay Kumar Jain and Others
FIR No. 91/01 PS: Chandni Chowk Page 21 of 22
following cases : Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1957 SC
637; Anil W. Singh v. State of Bihar, (2003) 9 SCC 67; Reddy Sampath W. v.
State of A.P, (2005) 7 SCC 603 and Ramreddy Rajesh Khanna Reddy v. State
of A.P, (2006) 10 SCC 172.