Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)Section 21 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957
The Arms Act, 1959
Vikram Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 25 August, 2020
13. Given the nature of the allegations and the other circumstances peculiar to this
case, the petitioner shall not enter the property, workplace, and residence of the victim
until the statements of all non-official and informal witnesses in the trial are recorded.
This Court is imposing this condition to rule out any attempt by the accused to
incapacitate, influence, or cause any discomfort to the victim. Reference be made to
Vikram Singh v Central Bureau of Investigation, 2018 All SCR (Crl.)
Aparna Bhat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 March, 2021
458); and Aparna
Bhatt v. The State of Madhya Pradesh, 2021:INSC:192, 2021 SCC Online SC 230.
Mohammed Zubair vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 20 July, 2022
In Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi, 2022:INSC:735
[Para 28], Writ Petition (Criminal) No 279 of 2022, Para 29, decided on July 20, 2022, A
Three-Judge bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court holds that "The bail conditions imposed
by the Court must not only have a nexus to the purpose that they seek to serve but must
also be proportional to the purpose of imposing them. The courts, while imposing bail
conditions must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial. While
doing so, conditions that would result in the deprivation of rights and liberties must be
eschewed."
1