Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)

Vikash Kumar Gupta vs State Of Raj And Ors on 27 July, 2021

Learned counsel for the petitioners made submissions that judgment in the case of Vikesh Kumar Gupta (supra) does not dilute the law laid down in several of the judgments dealing with the determination of the objections by the Courts on the parameters laid down in those cases and as such, merely based on judgment in the case of Vikesh Kumar Gupta (supra), it cannot be said that the issue does not require consideration of this Court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 0 - Cited by 111 - I Singh - Full Document

H.P.Public Service Commission vs Mukesh Thakur & Anr on 25 May, 2010

"14. Though re-evaluation can be directed if rules permit, this Court has deprecated the practice of re- evaluation and scrutiny of the questions by the courts which lack expertise in academic matters. It is not permissible for the High Court to examine the question papers and answer sheets itself, particularly when the Commission has assessed the inter se merit of the candidates (H.P. Public Service Commission v. Mukesh Thakur & Anr.). Courts have to show deference and consideration to the recommendation of the Expert Committee who have the expertise to evaluate and make recommendations.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 842 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

The Rajasthan Public Service ... vs Tarsaim Kumar on 28 January, 2021

From the above categoric determination made by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Vikesh Kumar Gupta (supra), as followed in the case of Tarsaim Kumar (supra) by the Division Bench of this Court, though it is true that earlier judgments laying down the parameters for interference by this Court, though have not been reversed, the same to a great extent, have been circumscribed.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1