Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)
National Insurance Company Limited vs National Insurance Company Limited on 12 March, 2021 cites

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd vs Valsa @ Valsamma on 13 September, 2011

9. Undisputedly, the deceased had only 4 ½ years service left. The Tribunal, in the impugned award, had given cogent reasons to adopt the split multiplier as laid down by the Division Benches of this Court In Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Valsa and Kumaran v. Roy Mathew (supra). However, this Court without stating any reasons adopted multiplier 11 and awarded compensation on the full salary of the deceased even after the superannuation date. Similarly, this Court has awarded compensation for loss of consortium and also compensation for loss of love and affection which is RP.No.24 of 2020 in MACA.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 12 - T R Nair - Full Document

Puttamma W/O Lt Ramadas vs K L Narayana Reddy S/O Lt Lakshmaiah ... on 10 March, 2010

7. Sri.Pushaparajan Kodoth, the learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 4 placed reliance on paragraph 34 of decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Puttamma v. Narayana Reddy (supra) and contended that the Supreme Court has held that unless there are specific reasons and evidence on record, the Tribunal should not apply the split multiplier method in a routine course, but RP.No.24 of 2020 in MACA.
Karnataka High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 521 - M M Shantanagoudar - Full Document
1